Liquid assets 2

The judgment in the case of Public Prosecutor v Giorgio Ferrari is now available on the internet - http://lwb.lawnet.com.sg/legal/lgl/rss/subcourts/63675.html

Normally, such judgments are only available free for a period of about 3 months, following which only Lawnet subscribers will be able to access it.

Readers of a previous blog will remember that the case involves charges relating to Goods and Services Tax and customs duties of over $400,000 payable by his alcohol business. It was surprising that with such a large amount of duty evaded, there was only a massive fine but no jail time. The judgment now clarifies the situation.

The alcohol was stored in a licensed warehouse where no duty is paid for the time being. For supplies to diplomatic missions like foreign embassies, the alcohol can be taken out without any duty having to be paid. However, the process requires applications for approval from Singapore Customs, which would delay delivery to customers. Because these customers required the alcohol at short notice, Ferrari would supply them with duty-paid alcohol from its own stock. It would later apply for the necessary Customs permits, and it would then use the duty free alcohol allowed under the permits to replace its earlier withdrawn stock. This was a breach of the Customs rules.

The court accepted that Ferrari had gained no economic advantage as in the end, no duty was evaded, but he had gained intangible advantages. The court allowed him to pay the huge fine of just over $2.5 million over a period of 30 months subject to sureties for the whole amount being provided.

The case is interesting as the judge remarks it is the first of its kind.